Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Between 10% and 20% of the population experience personality disorders. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than - Wridemy Essaydoers

Between 10% and 20% of the population experience personality disorders. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than

Between 10% and 20% of the population experience personality disorders. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than individuals with other mental health disorders. Treatment can be challenging as they do not see their symptoms as painful to themselves or others. 

Paraphilic disorders are far more common in men than in women, and generally quite chronic, lasting at least two years. Treatment of these disorders usually involves both psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic treatments.

In this Assignment, you will explore personality and paraphilic disorders in greater detail. You will research potentially controversial elements of the diagnosis and/or treatment and explain ethical and legal considerations when working with these disorders 

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:

1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM.

2). AT LEAST 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS (WITHIN 5YRS, OR LESS THAN 5YRS)

3). PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED FOR: Rubric details, WK5 Assignment Direction/Instruction,.

4). Please review and follow the grading rubric details and include each component in the assignment as required. Also, follow the APA 7 writing rules and style/Format.

PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THE INSTRUCTOR’S EXPECTATIONS BELOW AND PLEASE FOLLOW:

Assignments MUST have a 50% or less on Safe assign.  I have had students fail out of the course in the past for PLAGERISM.

 

AND IF IT'S HIGHER AND THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT PAST ASSIGNMENTS WERE REUSED FROM ANOTHER COURSE OR THERE ARE ANY SIGNS OF PLAGIARISM, AN AI INVESTIGATION WILL BE OPEN. 

“Please the assignment should include a brief introduction, purpose statement, ICD codes for each Differential Diagnosis and screening tools for the diagnosis, Diagnostic Results should include some lab work, screening tools used for each diagnosis, etc.”.

“PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO MESSAGE ME FOR ANY CLARIFICATION OR MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE ASSIGNMENT”.

Thank you  

,

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

  Excellent 90%–100% Good 80%–89% Fair 70%–79% Poor 0%–69%
In 2–3 pages, address the following:

• Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder.

Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
• Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

In 2–3 pages, address the following:

• Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder.

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Good 80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Fair 70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Good 80%–89% 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Fair 70%–79% 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

,

Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders

Between 10% and 20% of the population experience personality disorders. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than individuals with other mental health disorders. Treatment can be challenging as they do not see their symptoms as painful to themselves or others.

Paraphilic disorders are far more common in men than in women, and generally quite chronic, lasting at least two years. Treatment of these disorders usually involves both psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic treatments.

In this Assignment, you will explore personality and paraphilic disorders in greater detail. You will research potentially controversial elements of the diagnosis and/or treatment and explain ethical and legal considerations when working with these disorders.

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on assessing, diagnosing, and treating personality and paraphilic disorders.

· Select a specific personality or paraphilic disorder from the DSM-5-TR to use for this Assignment.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate your chosen disorder further, including controversial aspects of the disorder, maintaining the therapeutic relationship, and ethical and legal considerations. 

·

The Assignment

In 2–3 pages:

· Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected disorder.

· Explain your professional beliefs about this disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a patient that may present with this disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to this disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?